Skip to main content

Calories burned calculator

Pick an activity and a duration. MET values do the rest.

Runs in your browser. Nothing is sent, saved, or shared.

kg

Intensity matters more than the name. A brisk walk is nearly double a stroll.

min

Time actually moving, not time at the gym.

Extra calories burned

178

Net figure, with the resting burn you would have had anyway removed

Gross total
232

Including resting burn

Per minute
5.2
MET value
4.3

That is roughly 0.4 large muffins, which is the part worth sitting with. Trackers commonly overstate burn by 20 to 30 percent, and eating back an inflated figure is the usual reason a deficit quietly stops being one.

A runner on a path in morning light

What a MET actually is

One MET is the energy you burn sitting still. An activity rated at 8 METs burns roughly eight times that. Multiply METs by body weight in kilograms and by hours, and you have an estimate of calories burned.

The values come from a published compendium of physical activities, which is where almost every fitness tracker gets its numbers too. It is the same arithmetic behind the watch on your wrist, with fewer sensors and more honesty about the error bars.

Why every estimate here is generous

Two things inflate the figure people usually quote. First, the total includes the calories you would have burned anyway just being alive during that hour, which is not extra. Second, MET values are population averages, and a fit person burns less doing the same work because they are more efficient.

This tool shows both the gross total and the net figure with your resting burn subtracted. If you are eating back exercise calories, the net number is the honest one, and it is often a third smaller.

The gap that undoes most diets

A 45 minute run burns roughly what a large muffin and a latte contain. That is not an argument against running, which is worth doing for reasons unrelated to calories. It is an argument against treating exercise as a licence to eat.

Trackers overestimating burn by 20 to 30 percent is well documented, and the effect compounds if you eat back what the watch reports. Treat the number as a rough guide rather than a budget you have earned.

How to estimate calories burned

  1. 1

    Enter your weight

    Energy cost scales almost directly with body mass, so this is the main input.

  2. 2

    Pick the activity and intensity

    Intensity matters more than the activity name. A brisk walk and a stroll differ by roughly double.

  3. 3

    Set the duration

    Time actually moving, not time at the gym including rest between sets.

  4. 4

    Read the net figure

    Gross includes what you would have burned anyway. Net is the extra, and the honest number if you are eating it back.

Questions people ask

How many calories does walking burn?
A brisk walk at around 3.5 METs burns roughly 250 calories an hour for a 70 kg person. A slow stroll is closer to 150. Enter your own weight above for a figure that fits you.
Are calorie burn estimates accurate?
They are estimates from population averages and commonly overstate the real figure. Fitness trackers have been shown to overestimate by 20 to 30 percent, so treat any burn number as a rough guide.
What is the difference between gross and net calories burned?
Gross is the total during the activity, including what you would have burned resting anyway. Net subtracts that resting amount and is the extra you actually spent. Net is the right figure if you are eating exercise calories back.
Should I eat back the calories I burned?
Usually only some of them, if any. Estimates run high, and eating back an inflated figure is the most common reason a calorie deficit quietly stops being a deficit.

Numbers are easy. Doing it every day is the hard part.

A calculator tells you where you are once. If the thing you actually want is to keep something up, that takes a record rather than a result.